Read Full Transcript
We put out a call to our audience for their burning questions and two listeners essentially asked the same thing. How do you invest ethically? So today, Scott and I are sharing how we think about ethical investing, not to tell you what to do, but to help you think through how to build a portfolio that aligns with your own values and supports your path to financial independence.
Hello, hello, hello and welcome to the BiggerPockets Money Podcast. My name is Mindy Jensen and with me as always is my highly ethical co-host, Scott Trench.
Thanks Mindy, I’m excited to do a good job answering these questions today on BiggerPockets Money. So very excited to get into this. This is a really important question. I think it it hangs up a lot of people. I’ve gotten this question at least 10 times over the years from various BiggerPockets Money listeners either themselves uncomfortable with participation in an economy that has some bad actors, some businesses that they believe have questionable practices or some businesses that just are doing things that are not aligned with their values. Gotten this question from folks who are asking about, hey my friend told me that I’m evil for investing and participating in the evils of capitalism. You know, they threw in words like slave labor and these other things that capitalism has enabled. How do I respond to that and justify what I’m doing here? I don’t have a framework for doing that. And I feel bad about it. Parts of those arguments, you know, resonated with me. And so I think that’s the question we’re going to attempt to tackle today. And Mindy and has that ever come up in in your world to you as well?
That hasn’t come up quite so directly and strongly as, you know, saying that you’re evil for investing, but honestly, a good mental shift is you’re never going to change that person’s mind, don’t ever talk about investing with that person again because they are clearly not going to listen to what you have to say. They have made up their mind and they’re not gonna change it.
So Mindy, what what is your view on whether investing in a general sense including in public traded companies or index funds that own aggregations of public traded companies, um whether it’s ethical or not?
So, Scott, the term ‘ethical’ means behaviors that align with accepted moral principles. I want to provide for my family. So I am going to invest to grow my net worth. So in that case, yes, it is ethical to invest in the stock market. Now, there are some companies that I choose not to invest in, there are companies that I choose to invest in on purpose because of what they’re doing for environmental issues. Like is it investing in the stock market ethical? Based on that description, yes. How about you? Do you think it’s ethical to invest in the stock market?
Yes, I think it is ethical to invest in the stock market. I think it’s ethical to invest in a variety of assets including real estate, and I believe that because I’m a big proponent of capitalism. I believe that the cruel, cruelty of a society is that resources are finite and scarce and that they need to be allocated more efficiently, and capitalism as a market economy, we do a reasonable job, better than many alternatives at allocating those resources efficiently. Now, I won’t go out of my way to invest in a company that I don’t think is behaving responsibly, like a tobacco company for example. But I’m also not going to, you know, avoid an S&P 500 index fund specifically to make sure that a small percentage of that allocation is not going to the tobacco company for example. I’ll get into this philosophy in a little bit here, but I think it’s very hard to pull out the good guys versus the bad guys in a basket of companies, right? You may love Costco for example and love how, you know, they treat their employees and the the worldview that they espouse. I certainly love Costco, I’m a big Costco guy, but then you know their chickens do not have a good existence and that’s why you have cheap chickens and that’s why you have cheap eggs from Costco. And that’s a real real point of consideration. So I don’t think that there’s a pure way to participate in a capitalist economy, there are only trade-offs, but I’m comfortable with the trade-offs that come with capitalism. I wish I could change some things about the version of capitalism we live in today. But I’m I’m comfortable with it as a broad concept. I don’t feel it’s morally incompatible to participate in that system via a variety of investments.
I absolutely agree, and it’s funny that you said the tobacco company because that was the one that I specifically do not invest in on purpose, even though they’re having record profits every year. And I looked them up. They are on the S&P 500 and they are approximately 0.17% of the S&P 500. I’m okay with making that trade-off, like you said, because there a small percentage of the S&P 500. We specifically started investing in Tesla in 2012 because they were making electric cars. They have produced about 9 million cars. So that’s 9 million non-internal combustion engines on the road because of this company. We thought it would be an interesting experiment. So we put a little money in there. And as they grew, like Tesla made electric cars sexy. There were other electric cars before Tesla like came on the road en masse, but they were like, Honda had one and it wasn’t all that great. And other car companies had some, but they weren’t that great. And here comes Tesla and they run really well and, you know, they’re reliable, they’re fun. Scott, what kind of car do you drive?
I drive a Tesla. I think that Tesla is a great example because, you know, you can take the opposition point of view about morality and talk about some of the personal practices of Elon Musk that I think now everybody from both parties can find something that they don’t like about Elon Musk uh at this point and everybody from both parties may find one or two things that they do like about Elon Musk over the last couple of years. So you have that dynamic. And then of course, the extraction of lithium from the environment has been taking a terrible toll in certain areas. And so that’s where it comes down to, right? Like, oil and gas power the vast majority of American cars and Tesla is making a real dent in that and there are trade-offs that come with that and that’s the challenge of society is every single company in the S&P 500 produces a good or service that other people want and are willing to pay for. And every single company does it in the pursuit of profit. and that’s capitalism. That’s how you get 8 billion people worldwide to work together to create computers, pencils, keyboards, houses, the materials that go into them. That’s how that that works. And there are other ways to maybe do it. Maybe we’ll find a better version that exists someday. But overall, the net effect is a drastically increasing standard of living for most of the world’s population, more and more people coming out of poverty. And I’m proud to participate in a system like that despite its flaws. So I think that there’s there’s two parts of that, right? There’s the is it ethical to invest? Yes, that’s my worldview. Now, steelmanning the opposition, saying taking this position of somebody who’s trying to be morally pure and never participate in any of the bad things. We have to create a subjective view of what good is, right? One person may think that defense contracting is evil and I don’t want to participate in that. Another person may feel like the defense contracting is a good that they want are very happy and willing to pay for because it allows them to discuss other issues like whether capitalism is a good or bad thing and not whether we’re gonna get invaded by this other country. That’s a two sides of that moral argument and you are not right in every one of your moral arguments. Neither is the other guy in in these, right? And that’s the challenge with with moral arguments is capitalism does not argue what is moral, it just allows people who want to pay for something to buy it with their own dollars if they have the means to generate them. There’s only so much beach front property in this country. How you allocate it used to be based on proximity to political power and today it’s still based on proximity to political power in some instances but also a little bit more based on production of goods and services that other people want.
I’m skeptical of a lot of financial products, but life insurance isn’t one of them. At least not term life. For the vast majority of you listening, term life is simply the right answer. And the smartest way to buy it isn’t one big policy, it’s a ladder. Your need for coverage isn’t flat. It declines over time. You’ve got a 30 year mortgage, a couple of young kids, maybe a spouse mid-career. In 15 years, the mortgage is going to be smaller and the kids are almost launched. So instead of buying one giant 30-year policy you’ll overpay for, you stack a few. Say a 10 year, a 20 year, and a 30 year layer. So your total coverage steps down as your actual obligations step down. You only pay for what you actually need when you need it. Ethos is a platform that helps you find life insurance 100% online. You can get a quote in seconds and apply in minutes. There’s no medical exam, you just answer a few health questions online. You can get up to 3 million in coverage. Some policies are as low as $30 a month. That makes building a ladder genuinely fast. Get your free quote at ethos.com/bpmoney. That’s ethos.com/bpmoney. Application times may vary and rates based.
Did you know that you already have an estate plan? The catch is that your state wrote it. They’re called intestacy laws and they decide who gets your stuff if you don’t. Spoiler, it’s probably not what you’d want. The good news is that this is something within your control to fix, this week if you want. And it’s not prohibitively expensive or a multi-month project. Trust & Will’s platform makes it easy to create your will or trust online. In as little as 30 minutes, you can create a will that lets you document your wishes for guardians, asset distribution, and healthcare planning. If you need expert input, attorney support is available as an add-on to your plan. And further, it’s easy to update your plan with trust and will at every life stage or transition. Trust & Will, affordable estate plans, priceless piece of mind. Go to trustandwill.com/bpmoney and get 20% off. That’s trustandwill.com/bpmoney to get your 20% off. trustandwill.com/bpmoney.
You may have seen some of the headlines about trouble in private credit. Many of those funds are floating rate corporate lenders with multi-year loans and exits tied to M&A activity. Pine Financial Group’s Fund 6 is a different animal. It’s short-duration bridge and hard money real estate loans, senior secured with personal guarantees. Pine has charged borrowers 10 to 14% consistently since 2008. That fund’s an 8% monthly preferred return to investors, plus an 80/20 profit split above the hurdle paid each January, targeting a 9 to 10% annual distribution. Real estate debt can be a way to diversify against stocks, bonds, and real estate equity. They’ve originated over a billion dollars since 2008 with 75% repeat borrowers, and they offer a nine-month initial lockup and then 90-day redemptions. You can learn more at biggerpocketsmoney.com/pine. This is a paid advertisement. I, Scott Trench, am an investor in one of Pine’s funds. Investing involves risk, including the loss of principle. See offering documents at biggerpocketsmoney.com/pine.
How do you respond to a listener who’s asking about once you’ve reached enough? Do you have a moral obligation to invest more ethically?
I think that’s a reasonable question, right? So I’m, I’m not chasing returns anymore or maybe I am and I want to invest in Tesla because I think that that’s a good company, I don’t know. But I think yes, there are options to invest that express certain world views out there. Before you do that, I want to get to why I framing why this problem is so hard. We’ve talked about how there’s trade-offs in all these other other companies here. But you can literally make a case that every act of participation in capitalism is evil if you choose to want to, right? Housing is a right, so it’s evil to own it or rent it or sell it for profit. Health care is a right. So any for-profit activity that services healthcare is evil. Food and basic household necessities are a right. Therefore investing in grocery stores or Costco again is evil. Many forms of energy production are bad for the environment. It’s evil to invest in energy. And so, you know, you you can get there with basically any form of logic and you can even go so far as if you open a bank account and you don’t even want to participate in the capital system by not earning interest, you are there by allowing the bank to arbitrage your capital and loan it out to these companies that you disagree with moral view. So there there is no way that I can see to totally fail to participate in the capitalist society and not at least in some way touch all of this interconnected chain in a morally pure sense that expresses a a specific vision. So you can only approach it. And I think there are options though to to do that once you get to a comfortable number. I think that’s where we should go next. So Mindy, what you you’ve done some research on this. What what are some of the things you found?
Well, there are, quote, unquote, ‘ethical’ investing options. Both Fidelity and Vanguard have, they call ESG funds, environmental, social and governance funds. And when I saw these, I was like, oh, great, this will be so easy. Yeah, you can ethically invest, just invest in ESG funds. But then I jumped into those ESG funds. Some of those holdings don’t really scream ethics to me. The E S G U S stock ETF holding for Vanguard, holds Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, which is Facebook, and Tesla. These are not the companies that I think of when I think of ethical investing. These are actually the companies that I think of, oh, those are probably the companies people are going to have a problem with. And I’m curious why those companies are in the ESG fund. Environmental? I don’t see anything in environmental except for Tesla. And you had the counterpoint that the lithium extraction is uh counterproductive of the environmental aspect of Tesla. I believe all of these companies are billionaires, the heads of all these companies are billionaires, with the exception of Elon Musk, who’s not a trillionaire. So the same people who ask about, you know, is it ethical to invest in the stock market are are a lot of the same people who are saying billionaires shouldn’t exist. I don’t have that thought. I think that these people became billionaires because they worked really hard. They worked hard or they bought a company that worked hard to become a billionaire. I think they should exist. Are they great people? I don’t know. I probably wouldn’t have a lot to say to them at a at a dinner party, but like even these ESG funds, I think are gonna be difficult. If you want to, you said pure investing, Scott, purely ethical investing, you’re going to have a much more difficult time finding investments that are producing returns, which is the whole reason to invest in the first place, while keeping in this pure ethics mindset that you’re having. I don’t think capitalism is bad.
I’ll even go so far as to say, I don’t think you can feasibly express purity. You can only approach something that you’re more personally comfortable with. Because in order to express a pure ethical world view as an investor or participant in capitalism, you have to first define that world view in great detail. You have to acknowledge trade-offs. There’s going to be no company out there that has a a pure model that you can arrive at at an extreme end of a world view here, right? We just talked about Costco, we just talked about Tesla. And you can talk about almost, almost any business that is for profit. There’s going to be a trade-off. There’s no way to grow lima beans in the Midwest and get them to Denver without some trade-off that somebody will find objectionable to some degree uh across there and and that’s about the least controversial building block of capitalism you can come up with, right? So I think that that’s going to be the first challenge. You have to define a world view. Then you have to figure out a way to express it. I think that these ESG funds may align reasonably well with some people’s world views. Some people’s world views may be more simple than what you just articulated there, which is I don’t want to participate with a tobacco company or alcohol industry or whatever. And maybe these ESG funds do a good job of doing that. And you can go find that and there’s a research project there. It’ll take you a lot of work to get there and you will have to make trade-offs. There’s always trade-offs. But I think you can get somewhere closer. I think it’s the wrong frame. I think it’s I think that that’s not the right way to frame participation in capitalism and the pursuit of financial independence from an ethical standpoint. If you have a world view that you want to push or changes you want to see imposed on society, the best way to express that is at the voting booth. Capitalism cannot be allowed to run totally unchecked. It must be constrained by the law in many cases. There are externalities, right? A company cannot in the pursuit of profit, dump all its waste in the river. There must be a government that comes into play and controls certain aspects of that capitalism. And there’s a debate that reasonable people disagree with on what those ought to be. And I think the way you should express those world views is in the voting booth and in the political arena, not in whether or not to participate in an index fund, which you could invest in the most ethical company in the world today, and then in five years, they’re not anymore. And you have to keep track of that across a huge basket. I I I think it’s an unreasonable ask of the average investor and putting your money to work with companies that are producing goods and services for human beings will come with trade-offs but will generally raise the standard of living across the economy and I’m comfortable and proud to participate in that personally.
So here’s another question for you, Scott. Is it ethical to pursue financial independence? Because then you’re not working any longer. You’re not contributing to society in air quotes, you’re not paying taxes. Is it ethical to pursue financial independence?
Absolutely. The pursuit of financial independence generally speaking, will come with producing much more than you consume for a prolonged period of time and then putting your your capital to work in the economy that continues to produce. You know, the other people are going to use to produce more goods and services. So I think that that is total, totally ethical. And I also think that the pursuit of financial independence for many people will empower them to stop having to work for money and they’re not going to go and play video games all day. There was like one Reddit post about a guy who plays video games all day and his wife called him a loser. I thought that was funny. I think that’s perfectly fine by the way. But I think many more people who pursue financial independence will spend their time on Reddit answering personal finance questions for people in the wee hours of the night. and that adds just as much value to those in many of those cases or to the discussion as maybe they would get from paying somebody in some cases or at least a component of that value um that they would get from paying other people. and that’s real value to the society as well. So how is that incompatible with an ethical existence? I don’t, I don’t think so.
Well, I think that anybody can make an argument that anything is unethical.
There’s ways to be financially independent or to move towards it that are unethical and there’s ways that are ethical.
Is it ethical to continue to work when you have enough, when you’ve reached your financial independence number?
Because you’re taking a job from somebody else?
Because you’re taking a job from somebody else.
Ethics is so hard. It’s it’s a world view that you you impose. Like let’s talk about real estate, right? Real estate, landlording, making a profit off somebody else. I think that the the country needs more housing. Real estate investing in the construction of housing for profit creates more housing. You can attempt to subsidize it with the government that doesn’t usually work in most cases. Most most impositions, many of the impositions that people place on capitalism create worse environments for renters and homeowners in their cities because they constrain supply. Some are necessary. Like we you have to be building properties that go to roads, right? Like that’s like those are reasonable level of government requirement for construction that’s, that’s a minimum here and then there’s there’s versions of it that are too much. The crime I think or the the the unethical thing is to create an environment where large amounts of housing are vacant. When housing is vacant, now something has gone wrong either with the intersection of capitalism and government or how things are going. And in capitalism at least, that punishes the owner of the property. In a in a reasonably pure expression of capitalism, if your property is vacant, you are not earning money on that property. And there’s an a very painful incentive if you have a leverage to get that property rented as soon as possible. That keeps housing stock full and much more efficiently getting connecting the people who need housing with the housing than alternatives. Now, other people are gonna come up with all these reasons why landlording is unethical. That’s fine. That’s a different expressions of the worldview on this, but every good, every service, every want, every need that people have in the United States of America or almost all of them are provided by for-profit enterprises and they’re provided at a better quality than in many other places in the world that are not capitalistic. Not all of them, but many of them. So that’s my defense of capitalism and my answer to this uh this ethics question here.
Yeah, I think it is ethical to pursue financial independence. I think it’s ethical to continue to work when you have enough. I think that ethics is when you are doing something wrong and you know that you’re doing something wrong. I think that’s when something becomes unethical. So I’m not doing something wrong by investing in the stock market. I don’t know that I’m doing something wrong by investing in the stock market. The same with pursuing financial independence. It’s not wrong to pursue financial independence. It’s not wrong to continue to work when you have enough.
And it’s like, is it wrong to consume, right? That’s another one. Is it wrong to consume? I don’t know. Um on the one hand consumption takes resources. On the other hand, consumption creates jobs, right? For for other people. So it’s like what is like what what is right and what is wrong? I I think it’s, I think it’s you have to construct a worldview and my worldview is that the resources are finite and that’s the cruel reality. and the best we can do is create more of those resources and distribute them more efficiently to more people and to participate in that in some way, whether it’s for profit or not across my lifetime. and that’s what we’re trying to do here at BiggerPockets Money, right? Like like financial information and research on fire and real estate investing and the intersection of complicated problems for people who have accumulated wealth and want to actually get optionality back into their life. That’s expensive and hard to come by. And we’re trying to make that available at lower cost and better quality than other folks. And that’s our, me and you, participation in that system in our, in our small way.
If you’ve been putting off life insurance, I get it. The old process was miserable. Phone calls with an agent, a nurse coming to your house for a blood draw, then waiting weeks to find out what you’d pay for. That friction is exactly why so many people who should have coverage don’t. Here’s what I believe. Most BP Money listeners need term life and the right move is to build a ladder. A few term policies of different lengths stacked together, so your coverage steps down as your mortgage shrinks and your kids get closer to being financially independent or you get closer to hitting your financial independence number. The thing that makes that practical now is Ethos, a platform that helps you find life insurance, all 100% online. Same-day coverage, no medical exam, you just answer a few health questions online, up to $3 million in coverage, some policies as low as $30 a month. So building a two or three-layer ladder that used to take a month of appointments is something you can knock out before your coffee gets cold. Get your free quote at ethos.com/bpmoney. That is e t h o s.com/bpmoney. Application times may vary and rates may vary.
Did you know that you already have an estate plan? The catch is that your state wrote it. They are called intestacy laws and they decide who gets your stuff if you don’t. Spoiler, it’s probably not what you’d want. The good news is that this is something within your control to fix this week if you want. And it’s not prohibitively expensive or a multi-month project. Trust & Will’s platform makes it easy to create your will or trust online. In as little as 30 minutes, you can create a will that lets you document your wishes for guardians, asset distribution, and healthcare planning. If you need expert input, attorney support is available as an add-on to your plan. And further, it’s easy to update your plan with trust and will at every life stage or transition. Trust & Will, affordable estate plans, priceless piece of mind. Go to trustandwill.com/bpmoney and get 20% off. That’s trustandwill.com/bpmoney to get your 20% off. trustandwill.com/bpmoney.
Pine Financial Group’s Fund 6 is a real estate debt fund but not like the private credit funds making headlines for liquidity problems. Those funds hold long term corporate loans where exits depend on M&A or private equity events. Fund 6 originates short duration bridge and hard money real estate loans senior secured with personal guarantees. And because Pine has charged borrowers between 10 and 14% consistently since 2008 regardless of where the Federal Funds rate sits, the fund pays investors an 8% preferred return monthly with a target net annual distribution of 9 to 10% after the profit split. They originated over a billion dollars since 2008 with 75% of those loans going to repeat borrowers. They have a nine-month lock-up period and then redemptions are available with a 90 days notice. Learn more at biggerpocketsmoney.com/pine. This is a paid advertisement. I, Scott Trench, am an investor in Pine’s funds and investing involves risk including the loss of principle. See the offering documents at biggerpocketsmoney.com/pine.
Scott, is avoiding bad companies more important than supporting good companies?
What’s a bad company?
Ah, I like that answer. What is a bad company? I think that’s up to everybody to define for themselves. If you are struggling with this ethics question, is it ethical to invest in the stock market? Then define what does a bad company mean? What does a good company mean? And you can selectively invest based on, like you can pick stocks. You can choose to put a portion of your money into the S&P 500 index because that’s what the FIRE community is recommending or Vanguard or total stock market whatever, a broad market index fund, I’m not telling you just S&P 500. You can choose to invest in index funds and then also put more money into companies that you deem are good and less money into companies that you deem are bad or no money into the companies you deem are bad. But I think the ethical investing question comes from like you and your specific values.
That’s the question, right? Is you have to define good and bad. and that’s really hard. If you handed me a world view that was crystal clear, I’d still have a hard time identifying a company that matched that exactly, right? What are the political beliefs of the founder. How about the CEO? How about the CFO? That’s why it’s so challenging. And and again, capitalism crosses through all of those items and allows the company to get rewarded if they produce something other people want or need and they do it at a better value or a better cost or whatever than other people, that allows them the chance to make profit. So it’s not perfect, it’s not ideal, but it is the best I think that we’ve come up with so far with some real challengers from different flavors of capitalism in other places around the world.
And you could do a lot of good with money. So grow your money, grow your net worth and then with your financial freedom, you can donate your time or your money to causes that mean a lot to you.
I love that. I’ve been really interested in climate change personally, right? That’s something I feel is like a big issue. And so I’ve been looking up the organizations that are doing the most cutting edge research to pull carbon out of the atmosphere and and and one of my goals is to totally offset my carbon footprint in my family’s over the course of my lifetime with giving. People roll their eyes at that, you know, uh, in in some cases, but I was just one aspect of giving that I thought was important to me and that I’m proud proud to contribute to. But I’m not going to direct my investment portfolio to that pursuit. I give to that pursuit.
And you know what, Scott, I think that’s a great distinction.
That’s what we got on ethical investing. Ethics is such a loaded question. People’s emotions will get riled up, people have very strong opinions. These are our opinions on it. We’d love to hear yours in the comments even if you vehemently disagree. Uh is that vehemently or vehemently? I don’t think I’ve ever used that word aloud.
I say vehemently.
Vehemently. Yeah, vehemently, yes there ya go. Depending on how that goes. We we’d love to hear your feedback though. and we’d love to hear ways that you are expressing ethics in investing or in other areas of your life if that’s important to you along the the financial independence journey. Um, because I think we can learn from more examples of people who are doing this and I think that that may inspire other people to do some version of that for themselves.
Yes, Scott, I would love to hear from people who are investing in line with their values, in line with their ethical stance. So please email scott@biggerpocketsmoney.com or email mindy@biggerpocketsmoney.com. We would love to hear from you, even if it’s just anonymous. We would love to hear how you’re handling this ’cause it is, it is kind of a tricky question.
With no right answer.
Absolutely.
All right, Scott. Should we get out of here?
Let’s do it.
That wraps up this episode of the BiggerPockets Money podcast, but you don’t have to stop learning just because we stop talking. Hop on over to biggerpocketsmoney.com where you can find resources and calculators and all sorts of templates to help you on your FIRE journey. Hey, Scott, how much do we charge for that?
We have three packages. The starter package is free, the middle tier package is also free, and the master tier package is also free.
All right, so free resources available at biggerpocketsmoney.com. You can also check us out on Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube. Okay. Now we are off. He is Scott Trench. I am Mindy Jensen saying see you later, alligator.
When I evaluate debt funds, I look for things like first position loans, personal guarantees, deep experience by the fund operator, low fund leverage, fast liquidity and consistent returns. These are some of the reasons why I’m excited to partner with Pine Financial Group. Their Fund 6 offers investors an exposure to real estate credit largely for a construction and rehab with loans originated by an experienced originator with over $1 billion in origination volume. They offer investors an 8% preferred return paid monthly and a 70/30 LP/GP split of everything over 10% paid annually. The lock-up period is nine months with liquidity available within 90 days after that nine month commitment. The fund is open to accredited investors only. The fund’s minimum investment is typically $100,000, but Pine Financial is able to reduce that minimum for BiggerPockets Money listeners to a minimum of $25,000. Full disclosure, I am personally invested in this fund through my self-directed IRA. Pine Financial is sponsoring this message and our podcast. Go to biggerpocketsmoney.com/pine, P I N E. Please note that returns are not guaranteed and may vary based on fund performance.
There’s a reason most big wealth management firms don’t like talking about flat-fee planning. It’s because it puts the power and the profit back in your pocket. I’ve been working with David Jackson at Domain Money because I wanted a fiduciary who didn’t care about selling me products or making asset under management fees that grew as my portfolio grew. I wanted a partner who would look at my whole financial picture with all of its complexity and give me a personalized step-by-step road map to reach my goals faster. If you want a plan that’s built for your benefit, not your advisor’s, you need to check out biggerpocketsmoney.com/cfp. This is a promotion for Domain Money, a registered investment advisor with the SEC. BiggerPockets Money may receive compensation if you choose to work with Domain Money as a client. I, Scott Trench, am a current client of Domain Money and receive non-cash compensation related to this promotional activity. This is not personalized investment advice. For the full disclosures, visit biggerpocketsmoney.com/cfp.
